0:00
/
0:00
Transcript

Tom Nichols: Why Are We Still Surprised?

124
62

On today’s “To the Contrary” podcast, Tom Nichols and I try to sort it all out…. My first question: Why — after all this time — are we still Surprised? By the lawlessness? The bullying? The performative cruelty? You can listen/watch right here, or: Watch on YouTube / Listen (and subscribe) on Apple/ Spotify / iHeart / RSS Feed.

No, you’re not the crazy one. And we’re here to remind you of that everyday. To the Contrary is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Some highlights of our conversation….

Tom’s only surprise has been…

Is the Supreme Court an activist court?

Putin’s power move…

Law and Order vs. due process…

The complications of military reorganization….

Nota Bene

In the annals of retribution:

**

In the annals of tone-deafness:

Trump envoy is Putin’s useful idiot:

“Witkoff said he had ‘liked’ the Kremlin leader, adding: ‘I thought he was straight up with me.’ He then said it was ‘gracious of [Putin] to accept me, to see me’ in Moscow.

"I don't regard Putin as a bad guy," he said.

**

And then there is this classic bit of out-of-touchedness: “Trump’s commerce secretary: Don’t complain if we don’t send your Social Security check”- MarketWatch

“Let’s say Social Security didn’t send out their checks this month,” Lutnick said during a YouTube interview Friday. “My mother-in-law, who’s 94, she wouldn’t call and complain. She just wouldn’t. She’d think something got messed up and she’ll get it next month.

By contrast, he said, “a fraudster always makes the loudest noise, screaming, yelling and complaining. … Anybody who’s been in the payment system and the process system knows the easiest way to find the fraudster is to stop payments and listen. Yeah. ’Cause whoever screams is the one stealing.”

The comments, coming just as Musk and his DOGE team slash the number of people working at Social Security and close branch offices, are unlikely to win friends and influence people even among Republicans, let alone anyone else.

Some 69 million Americans rely on Social Security checks every month, including 55 million retirees; 6 million widows, widowers and orphans; and 8 million people with disabilities.

And while the checks may be a “nice to have” for people who are better off financially, they are an economic lifeline for millions. The Social Security Administration estimates that among people over age 65, 39% of men and 44% of women rely on their Social Security checks for more than half their monthly income, while for 12% of men and 15% of women over 65, those checks account for “90% or more of their income.”

So while the mother-in-law of a Wall Street billionaire might not worry too much if her monthly check was late, others might worry if their own goes missing.

A Note to Readers

Once again: Thank you for subscribing. Even though we launched the podcast only a month ago, the “To the Contrary” newsletter had more than 2.3 million views in the last 30 days and is headed toward 70,000 subscribers.

By now it should be clear that we cannot count on traditional outlets — including the corporate media — to stand athwart this madness and shout “Stop.”

To the Contrary is a reader-supported publication. There are no investors. No sugar daddies. We’re not affiliated with any PACS. Or parties. Just me. And the dogs.

To receive new posts — including podcasts and videos— please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. (And I’m immensely grateful for your generous support.)

Your Sunday dog

Auggie and I went on a road trip yesterday. Burgers were involved.

Discussion about this video

User's avatar